Prettier

Where it stands

Built only from what we can measure or quote without using the tool. How ranking works

Read automatically from Prettier's public website: how reliable, secure, private and open the site is. This is not a test of how well the tool does its job. How this is measured

• Reliability5 / 5The page answered and finished downloading in 264 ms.
• Security2.8 / 51 of 5 protective headers set (strict-transport-security).
• Privacy4 / 51 third-party tracking service found: Google Analytics.
• Transparency1 / 5No privacy policy linked; no pricing page linked.

Not enough discussion yet: 11 classified comments from 2 threads. We need at least 12 from 2 threads.

• Positive

  “I'm very happy using this, coming from prettier with JS/VSCode and looking for a similar dev experience in Java/Intellij - it has an IntelliJ plugin that works well. Last time I looked I couldn't find any good IntelliJ…”

  Read in the thread
• Positive

  “I’ve learned that the benefit of Prettier outweighs its cost in this regard. At first I disliked things about Prettier. For example, indents violate eslint’s “indent” rule with multiline ternary alignment. However, I…”

  Read in the thread
• Critical

  “It's contrary to everything they claimed Prettier was about: for better or worse, we have decided on X so we can all move on to more important issues. I feel like the cost of changing defaults is wildly underestimated…”

  Read in the thread

Threads: Prettier 2.0 – Opinionated JavaScript formatter (2020, 90 comments) · Speeding up Prettier locally using the new –cache CLI option (2022, 6 comments)