Udacity

Where it stands

Built only from what we can measure or quote without using the tool. How ranking works

Read automatically from Udacity's public website: how reliable, secure, private and open the site is. This is not a test of how well the tool does its job. How this is measured

• Reliability5 / 5The page answered and finished downloading in 43 ms.
• Security5 / 55 of 5 protective headers set (strict-transport-security, content-security-policy, x-content-type-options, referrer-policy, x-frame-options).
• Privacy5 / 5No third-party tracking services found on the page.
• Transparency3 / 5Links a privacy policy; no pricing page linked.

Not enough discussion yet: 4 classified comments from 4 threads. We need at least 12 from 2 threads.

• Positive

  “I'm beginning to learn programming this year and have tackled a number of tutorials- Udacity's CS101 has been far and away the most helpful. This is the best format in my opinion- extremely short videos and regular…”

  Read in the thread
• Positive

  “Actually, the Udacity courses have very active forums. There is a good mix of experienced programmers and absolute beginners...if I ever have a problem, I usually have an answer within 5-10 minutes, and I get to return…”

  Read in the thread

Threads: React Native: A retrospective from the mobile-engineering team at Udacity (2018, 194 comments) · Peter Norvig to teach 'Design of Computer Programs' at Udacity (2012, 51 comments) · Udacity goes live (2012, 42 comments) · Udacity adds HTML5 Game Development Course (2013, 32 comments)