Wolfram Alpha

Where it stands

Built only from what we can measure or quote without using the tool. How ranking works

Read automatically from Wolfram Alpha's public website: how reliable, secure, private and open the site is. This is not a test of how well the tool does its job. How this is measured

• Reliability5 / 5The page answered and finished downloading in 425 ms.
• Security2.8 / 51 of 5 protective headers set (x-frame-options).
• Privacy5 / 5No third-party tracking services found on the page.
• Transparency3 / 5Links a privacy policy; no pricing page linked.

79% of the 14 people whose comments we could classify were positive. Read automatically from public Hacker News threads about Wolfram Alpha; the classifier is simple and can misread sarcasm, so check the threads. How this works

• Positive

  “Wolfram alpha should be positioned as a web search supplement. Just like how if you put some math equation into google search, it will calculate it for you, wolfram alpha has to do the opposite and add a web search for…”

  Read in the thread
• Positive

  “The problem with Wolfram Alpha is this: it's awesome when a query works, but often it either doesn't understand your query on the first try, or it just doesn't have the data or computation you're after. Siri has the same…”

  Read in the thread

Threads: Wolfram Alpha Live (2009, 117 comments) · Wolfram Alpha’s New Data about Pokémon (2013, 56 comments) · Announcing Wolfram Alpha Pro (2012, 53 comments) · Stephen Wolfram’s Introduction to Wolfram Alpha (screencast) (2009, 41 comments)